Why Can A Bank Block My Account

(Pre) prints of # 15m. Workers Democracy

article may actually have many titles, "Regeneration" democratic, "real and participatory democracy," Why do they call it democracy if it is not? "," No fulfill election promises should be a crime "," Eye to Camps and berlusconización English politics "and so on. All come to the same thing, actually in this democratic system we do not decide anything, and when we decided not decide for us. The problem is that when our lives run more or less calm (economically and socially speaking) we do not care, comfort comes even decide for we got there when things go bad and you decide you do in your own interest, then we decide, but we can not not know, we've been thinking so much about ourselves and our individual welfare outline even a small collective response costs us a tremendous effort.

I would like all we did an exercise in imagination. Imagine that at some point in the history of our democracy, major political parties had agreed to govern. Imagine you have decided to present political projects for the elections then not do so, to stage a political struggle on the surface but political, economic and social projects are identical in the background, imagine that it had agreed not to legislate on basic and important problems of the citizens of this country (home, work), not to worry, not advance, no rule, be permissive speculation. Imagine that it had agreed to enrich themselves with corruption, serve big capital and retire to a life more or less buoyant and assured. The sad thing is that everything that happens, no need to imagine so, although it is likely that there is any conspiracy theory behind what you can make sure is that there is mutual interest so that nothing changes, for this false democracy evolves.

I'll say the obvious, but I understand that it is necessary, corruption is a cancer of the system is a system failure, corruption is part and parcel of the democratic system, inseparable from it. Since there is democracy, there is corruption, even earlier. In fact, looking at the situation in perspective, we vote every four years a political project that is very similar to the political projects of other parties and also never implemented. The vote to a political project that does not take practice provides legitimacy for stakeholders of the political project make and undo without any public oversight, and above it he and his friends profit from its passage by the public service. Make no mistake, the corruption is not a party issue, not a question of people, corruption is the system itself. If IU, for example, ruled in more places where rules, be assured that corruption also exist at IU, as there is still no control city government that governs. Therefore, in reality, we do not decide on any major issue of our life together, only you can decide who will enrich every four years of our effort and our work.

I recently echoed a press release which contained a statement of Cayo Lara, federal coordinator of UI in the stating that "we want to make a dictatorship , " that the laws are carried the Gazette to the dictates of workers, not the corporate interests, by completely democratic means " , what might be called the dictatorship of the workers, but I personally prefer the term democracy for workers. And I wonder, what project policy behind to carry out this statement?, what kind of democracy we are talking about? Because if democracy is being proposed is a model of internal democracy IU, if what is being proposed is a bureaucratic state, which do not hold me. Maybe he was talking about another kind of participatory democracy and direct democracy but what else can wait but a projection of democracy that are already implemented within the UI?, What can you expect but a superstructure in the image UI structure?

Alternatives to the current situation, in this moment of crisis, not only financial crisis but systemic, cultural and dare I say even a crisis of values, many from the left appeal to the union of the same to counter the stakes of the markets and our ruling classes. Personally, this obsession of some part of the union left without knowing exactly on what basis, without a concrete political project objectives, reminds me of the obsession with growth of capitalism, it is important to grow the castle did not come down. The union can not be the goal, nor is the growth, the union is built on a political project which marked the real goals that we achieve as a community. In this regard, a few months ago I read an article by Julio Anguita, entitled Preparing another war , published in March 2011 at the World Worker, which proposes a series of measures to overcome the current situation a series of policies in post of a social outlet to the crisis. Julio Anguita least propose a political project basis to work on an alternative, but with all due respect I have for Julio Anguita, I think it has reached the merits, since that article only mentions a reform electoral law and nothing about new democratic means. The merits, in my view, is that we need a new democracy, more participatory and direct a new structure in which citizens have more involvement and control, we need a cultural revolution of the collective, with new democratic values \u200b\u200bdeeply, truly democratic. We need a movement from the bottom up, democratic regeneration, rather than a movement up and down, nationalization.

The situation is difficult but not bad at all. While the parties and unions have become distant power structures of the bases that are unable by its own constitution to accommodate the projects, ideas, claims and illusions citizens, committed people with good ideas to carry out, seeing that these structures have not been able to realize their projects, they have built up a network of partnerships of all kinds and social movements from which to implement this social commitment . We can say that political action has been divided into two, on the one hand, the political project is done without the feedback from practical experience, and on the other hand the experiences and projects of associations and social movements remain in the practical and do not become political projects that reach all citizens.

To get a more participatory and direct democracy, we need to party and union structures more participatory and directly democratic. To reach these structures must meet the policy actions, the party and association, social movement or assembly workers. I dream of a game where one can get there, choose which area do voluntary social (or membership), can do so through a partnership, make decisions in assemblies in the partnership in which they work, participate in discussion tables social area with other associations where will the political project proposals, voting presentations directly from the tables of debate, to elect the representatives of the party that will implement the political project and to remove representatives at any time when they step away from it (the project). Only with the facts and the model can transmit another democracy is possible, a workers' democracy. It will only be viable from the sample.

The # 15m

many will hit the streets to demand this type of democracy, but as I said, not only in relation to government, but also in relation to political parties and trade unions.

The # 15m, ultimately, we will go homeless, unemployed, self-employed, young people, pensioners, civil servants, the unemployed and workers in short, to denounce the abuse of bankers, politicians and big business.

Welcome, then, the class struggle. Marx's ideas are still alive.

Pedro Luis López Sánchez

Global Strategy - http://laestrategiaglobal.blogspot.com/

Orthodontist In Johor Bahru

Neither local nor regional, or general

With some outrageous numbers of unemployed, with social and labor cuts and an increase in the precariousness of living than ever before, with a soaring political corruption, once again, we are called to elect the mayors of our city and our representatives autonomous, in short, a number of individuals that we usurp the ability to decide for ourselves what we need.

We will promise many things: Let us out of the crisis, we will increase wages or that they will fix all the bad things that made those who came before them. A growing number of voters that he has no confidence in politicians who chooses, but this is no problem for democracy, which finds high levels of conformism your best ally.

In recent years we have witnessed an increase blatant political corruption. However, we do not understand corruption as short-term or exclusive of certain people or certain games. Experience shows that the delegation is the usurpation of the collective interest in favor of personal interest, the political interest of the shocking results in advance of the ruling class on the ruled. Cuts social work and are not exclusive product of a supposed economic crisis because, first, the great financial empires have had no withdrawal and, secondly, these setbacks are brewing for some time and will remain, even if times get greater economic prosperity.

High compliance rates are, as we said, the best ally of the parliamentary system. Not surprisingly, one of the concepts put forward by the political class is to tolerance: that is, endure, suffer or endure. However, only you can tolerate the negative, never positive, and is tolerated to avoid "bads seniors. " But we wonder how long we will tolerate this situation?, Where is our limit? Because it starts to become aware of something when that something is becoming intolerable and we come to ask if there are intolerable unemployment figures, corruption or job cuts and social.

is precisely in the area nearest the place where you are producing the biggest welfare cuts. Are the municipalities, the section of state power in our cities, who are promoting an increasing rate cuts individual freedom in the area of \u200b\u200bthe city by living Ordinances among other measures. It regulates how we must relate and where, what can and can not do or what can or can not tolerate. It is not free but we are civil, not worrying about our personal autonomy but rather compliance with the standards that others have chosen for us.

There are no alternatives within the parliamentary system. During the election campaign we will see much debate in which politicians will reveal how bad they are rivals, unbelievers hear his false election promises so that once they have achieved their purpose of parliament, they could spoil the search for your benefit personal.

That's where the new parties involved in the extra-parliamentary left. Extra-not because their field is outside Parliament, but because they have not got enough confidence to be in it. It's about doing a facelift of parliamentarism and the heirs of the various currents of Marxism have been found in the classic slogans of the workers struggle their best electoral credit. Have adapted perfectly to the theory of direct confrontation with his political strategy.

strikes, demonstrations and all kinds of actions are presented as a fundamental part of the electoral program. It tries to give the appearance that things can be done differently, but ultimately is to do the same: he appropriates the individual autonomy to relegate decision making about our lives in other people. We see this coat matches using slogans like get organized and fight, in his case translates to wiggle and vote. For them it is about creating a climate of organization, but social discontent, pull up a representative system to perpetuate it. Do not advocate direct action and organized unconditionally, but as part of its political program or delegation.

We, as anarchists advocate direct action without palliative. I do not understand how a propaganda method but as the only effective method to achieve the objectives we set out to act in our day to day. It's about acting, individually or collectively, against the social opponent just means individual and group, it is ultimately the State to recover the ground which has earned us the people.

Therefore, once again promote the Active Avoidance: Do not vote, Organize and Control.

Iberian Federation of anarchist youth
FIXED

Places For Baby Footprint Tattoos

And I that I have to do with the marriage of Paris and Helena

I came on at two-room to the house of my parents, weekday as there (Fridays unless job not PM) consequence little time having to eat and live to forty minutes of work. That day we were all, including nephews, except my little brother who recently moved to Monaco to work. At home my parents always talked about politics, we try to avoid it all (I the most) vehemently defend our ideas, we cut each other and raise our voice, but ultimately about politics, inevitable. The theme of the day was Osama Bin Laden, of course. I promise that I had sworn to myself not to spend any entry in this blog the issue, for reasons later try to explain, but it was inevitable.
soft
The conversation began, my mother commented that good Osama Bin Laden surely deserved to die but then to celebrate like a July 4th question had a long way, did not see fit to conclude the violent death of someone, no matter how terrorist and enemy of democracy whatsoever. The contradictions of receiving such information in support of the implementation of a human being as a terrorist and enemy of freedom but in the background has a sense of justice more human. Then the conversation escalated in essence I defended the idea that there should be a judge who decides whether Obama Bin Laden is a terrorist or not, if he has committed a crime or not and who should administer justice, which seemed very dangerous the precedent that a president could send their troops into a sovereign country, into the house of a man and run (with the additional death of other human beings) with the approval of the international community, the rest defended the idea that it was shown that Osama Bin Laden was negligible and better off dead than alive. I left home angry, how can it be that my family would justify an execution?, Where does this leave us?, How we can move towards a world more just, humane and egalitarian sentiments of hatred and revenge?

In the car I realized, again marked the political agenda again capitalism with its miseries. My sense of justice, I am convinced that Share my family can do nothing against the feelings of hatred and revenge with which capitalism justifies the implementation of a human being. Ethics, moral imperative of our time so, enhances the primitive instincts and negative feelings that are easily identifiable by the individuals that make up a company so that gets to silence the voices of reason, justice and true compensation for victims know the truth and punishing the guilty, to each and every one of them.

I admit, when I argue I'm not a person instructive, didactic. When not trying to argue that my arguments are understood by the people who participate in the discussion, but just try to be right, and my arguments fail. Not trying to steer the conversation away from arguments about hate and revenge, but I try to combat these feelings that lead to barbarism and fascism directly, and it is impossible. The fact is that the main idea round my mind about this death not even mentioned in the family discussion and I will take to transmit it.

As for me, Osama Bin Laden died on December 17, 2010. Mohamed Bouaziz that day, a young Tunisian seller caught fire in the Governorate of their city in Tunisia, in an act surely despair at the continuing humiliation that came receiving from the police in his country. A Muslim was killed, not to take with a few Western and thus achieve eternal life in paradise, but because he was stronger. This individual act unwittingly became a symbol of collective dignity. With this death, every Muslim who has taken to the streets demanding democracy, freedom and human rights, with each Tunisian, Egyptian, Libyan, Yemeni, Syrian, Algerian who have risked their lives by joining the revolution of collective dignity, with every scream , each square filled, more dead and buried was Osama Bin Laden, executed by Muslims themselves.

Ironically, some try to revive him with physical death. Do not want to talk about Osama Bin Laden because it is not part of my political agenda, is part of the political agenda of those who created, promoted, armed and when he turned against him executed. We have our own political agenda, the political agenda of revolution as a motor of history, that of participatory and direct democracy, the immigrants dead in the Mediterranean to our shame, the homeless, that of the unemployed, families that mix milk with water because they do not come for the entire month, the exploited, of those without papers, enclosed in centers for foreigners, the workers. Let's talk important, and let capitalism with its miseries and wars which have nothing to do.

We have nothing to do with a Nobel Peace has sent a terrorist to run their own intelligence services (the Nobel Peace) have been created in His image and likeness. We have nothing to do with the monsters, fear, misery and scale of values \u200b\u200bof the murderers who kill murderers. We, the workers, we have nothing to do with the marriage of Paris and Helena.

Pedro Luis López Sánchez
Global Strategy - http://laestrategiaglobal.blogspot.com/

Magnetic Strip For Shower Door

PROT. FIXED 3 [Fundamentals of carving].

Prot

fixed 3 [fundamentals of carving]

View more presentations from Ricardo .