Adderall And Alcohol Liver

The Arab Revolt and the permanent revolution

" In short, the Communists everywhere support every revolutionary movement against the existing social and political system"

IV Attitude of the Communists to the various opposition parties, Communist Manifesto Marx and Engels

Before I start out the lesson of humanity, compassion and solidarity that we are giving the Arab people to the old Europe and the Latin American socialism, that same Arab people who have sold us as extremist and terrorist that even in the adversity of the situation in their own countries are able to offer assistance to those displaced from Libya with the few resources they have, without complaint.

I attend as a dogma stunned to spread and contaminate the entire Marxist to Libya, because the cause is to defend "Gaddafi is our man" . In recent days I have read, written, thought and debate, and when analyzed in depth conspiracy theory in Libya to eventually become an impenetrable wall. Namely, if NATO went to Libya "Gadhafi was our man, everything is an assembly organized by the empire to overthrow him and seize Libyan oil" .

Consider first the principles of this conspiracy theory to try to reach the merits, the defense of National Socialism at all costs (as Trotsky called Stalin the tenets of Socialism in one country [1]) using the cause for this anti-imperialist.

"Libya is another Venezuela " [2]. The analysis of conspiracy theory begins with oil. As we all know Libya is a major producer of oil and therefore capable of being controlled and / or invaded by the empire. Therefore interpret everything that is happening in Libya due to a plot of the empire to take control of Libyan oil. As if oil multinationals are not already on Libyan soil! As if Gadhafi had not been in the area ensuring the stability the empire!

Do you think really that what is being set up in Libya is mounted on the outside? Do you think really that all that is being mounted in the Arab world, not only in Libya, is mounted on the outside? Do you think that Libya is different from other Arab countries? "The struggles in Iraq also are promoted by the empire? What are you looking for empire in Iraq with the revolts against it still? Are you trying to argue that everything that happens in the Arab world is different from Libya? Or on the other hand you are arguing that everything that happens in the Arab world is a mega conspiracy?

respond to all these questions making use of that conspiracy theory only reaches a point of contradiction and absurdity. Not recognizing the global causes that are coming into play in Libya leads to the conspiracy theory and error. The Libyan people in their field stands local causes most global rise in food prices, unemployment, lack of future of the youth, lack of social rights. It is a rebellion of Arabs against their semi-feudal systems for reasons essentially global.

Another postulate is to say that the manipulation of information from Libya rule demonstrates the hand of a master plan to seize the oil of the area [3]. It is obvious that Western countries try to position themselves along with the winning horse, once you have verified that the Libyan regime was not going to suppress the riots. It is obvious that once backed the winning horse will try to align with it, manipulate the information on your behalf and interfere as much as possible in the process that is unfolding now in Libya. But all this shows no plan. Shows that they are more intelligent, versatile and faster than the European and Latin American left in position. Moreover, this difference stems from Libya, Tunisia and Egypt, it has been argued that the rest of rebellions have been peaceful, which is more absurd [4]. However, news coming from Libya is that the "rebels" will not accept foreign intervention [5], information is not suspected of being manipulated by the empire.

The flag of the anti-imperialist cause is not our flag, we make use of it but it is not our flag. We have our own flag, the proletariat. Anti-imperialism is different than socialism. Anti-imperialism is not building socialism [6]. And I have the strange feeling that some silences hidden behind National Socialist views and positions, which would be jeopardized if the current unrest to become a comprehensive Arab revolution. Some seats would become extremely uncomfortable.

At this point it is time to ask what kind of speed we are, where we can take and what is the role of the Arab proletariat.

First, even with the amount of smoke and dust that still exists in the air and prevents us from seeing the situation clearly appears to be a common pattern in all the Arab riots, and Libya is no different, namely, democratic demands. We are facing democratic revolutions. To focus on the situation, we assume quasi-feudal systems (at least not have "enjoyed" even a liberal democracy to use) where it has broken a wave of democratic revolutions, which applied to the particular context of each nation gives us distinct situations currently exist in Tunisia (no direction), Egypt (army custody) and Libya (repression). I will not enter the debate if the proletariat is at the forefront of the demonstrations or, if more or less organized, or if you take more or less organized. What should be clear is that there is a total absence of organized opposition, including a liberal bourgeois opposition, and from a Marxist point of view, the only class that seems to be able to organize and meet the democratic demands of the population is the proletariat ( joining with other groups to do more frequent), the only truly revolutionary.

Secondly, I would point out that is not the first time it happens, it's been 94 Something similar happened years in Russia, a democratic revolution in February 1917 ended the tsarist system. And since then, we are witnessing rebellion against the provisional government established, if the recent resignation of Tunisian Prime Minister due to pressure on the Arab street [7], or the continuing demonstrations in Egypt. And compare the situation in North Africa and Middle East with Russia of the early twentieth century with all the facts, then, despite the differences, we assume autocratic system without an organized bourgeois opposition, and with an impoverished population. Following this reasoning, if the principles of Trotsky permanent revolution [8] are satisfied in this case, it is not unreasonable to think that the Arab revolutionary left to get organized and what has started as a democratic revolution without interruption end deriving a proletarian socialist revolution.

Thirdly include the global nature of the transgressions that we are witnessing. Trying to raise the issue across countries, local context to the local context, in my view is a mistake, because the causes are essentially global, systemic crisis, rising food prices, unemployment, lack of future total absence social rights, all of them common to all Arab countries. The capital has been globalized, globalizing it its own contradictions, but also globalizing it new elements and means of struggle. We must not neglect the importance of the Internet and social networks in the uprisings, but they are only the means of global communication in a global default (at least in the Arab context) within global capitalism, immersed in a global crisis. Our Western countries, "democratic" bourgeois minority are exploiting the world that condemns poverty and misery to most human beings on this planet. Fitting not expect to revolt against the bourgeoisie itself, we are witnessing the finding a rebellion from south to north, from the underdeveloped countries to developed countries. From a global point of view it seems to make more sense, although I realize it is too early to speak of Arab revolution, let alone global revolution.

In contrast to the reasoning I have tried to expose in this article, but I have found fear. Fear of the hand of imperialism. Fear of Libyan tribes. Fear of NATO intervention. Fear of uncertainty. Fear of revolution. Fear of change. Forget the romanticism of revolution. Revolutions are hard, extremely violent, uncertain, cruel and painful. But have no fear of power in exchange for a revolution for those who have to fear is another.

Given that it is common to manipulate with fear, I will try to do with the lack of it, you really are you afraid to change the world?, Who do you call socialists, communists and revolutionaries, scientists and humanists , have you afraid?.

Peoples of Europe, rise up!

One World, a global revolution

-

[1] Leon Trotsky, Permanent Revolution Edition Public Journal, Spain, 2009, p. 31

[2] The how and why of Libya , http://laboratoriodenoticias.es/spip.php?article189

[3] Mounting repression of demonstrators in Libya fighter. New lies to justify the imperialist intervention in northern Africa , http://antimperialista.blogia.com/2011/022301-el-montaje-de-la-represion-de-manifestantes-en-libia-con-cazabombarderos -.- nueva.php

[4] Jon Juanma, peaceful revolutions, Http://www.rebelion.org/noticia.php?id=123019

[5] "We are totally against any military intervention by any country which is" , http : / / www.rebelion.org/noticia.php?id=123269&titular =% 22estamos-totally-against-the-any-intervention% F3n-military-to-any-pa% EDs-it-is% 22

[6] Nazanin Amirian, Marxists and Islamists , http://www.rebelion.org/noticia.php?id=122880&titular=los-marxistas-y -the-Islamic-

[7] Alma Allende, Ghanoushi falls, remains Qasba , http://www.rebelion.org/noticia.php?id=123309

[8] Leon Trotsky, Permanent Revolution Edition Public Journal, Spain, 2009

Pokemon Rom Packages Cydia

ME AND MY RECYCLED!






bueeeno! ... HERE I SHOW THIS SMALL basket, so to speak, hehehe! IS THAT AN EVENING WITH MY DAUGHTER WENT TO THE SUPER AND ME (I CAN NOT WITH MY GENIUS) BOTTLE CAP FOUND THIS SHOT IN THE GARBAGE, THE VI TAN LINDA, so round, that he thought CAN I DO WITH THIS, WHILE THE RISE OF LAND ... AND MY DAUGHTER challenged me, because I'm always LIFTING CAPS, BOTTLES, CANS CHAPITAS OF THAT KEEP ME WHEN TO TURN ON LIGHT BULB ... JAJAJA! AFTER LEAVING GIFT THAT cute little thing. TELL THEM TO DRILL THE TOP WITH A SAME AHY punch TOME AND POINTS TO START WORK. SEE YA TO THE USE, PUT SOME OF WHICH ARE OVILLITOS EVERYWHERE AT HOME. I HOPE YOU LIKE THE IDEA.
KISSES FOR ALL!

Can I Give Penicillin To My Dog

Day for Self-Management of Madrid FIXED

The need to maintain our financial independence from any outside organization or institution, does not accept government subsidies or rely on the contributions of specific individuals, is enabling us to take action according to our need and our conscience and not fearing the reaction of one who feeds us. Practice


mutual support among colleagues, collaborating on projects administered, allows us to create a new network of networks outside of the state action when the time comes, they may decide to cut the tap. This is how we can really create an autonomous movement, based on solidarity and mutual support, values \u200b\u200bthat break with the paternalistic and selfish society.


Therefore, from the Anarchist Youth Federation of Madrid, attached to the Iberian Federation of Anarchist Youth (because we believe that federalism is mutual support), we call on rich vegan dining with a view to self-manage our project.

also in the afternoon, will be attended by fellow Rodolfo Montes de Oca, the Class Editor The Libertarian Venezuela, to tell us the reality of the anarchist movement in Venezuela these days, especially at the time Chavez.

The day will be Sunday March 6 at the premises of CNT-AIT Madrid Plaza Tirso de Molina May 2 º Left At 2:30 p.m. begin vegan dining room and start chatting 18h Rodolfo partner.

How To Wax Genital Area Of Ladies

Criticism of conspiracy theories in Libya Libya

is emerging in the English left, as far as I know, the idea that the rebellions in particular in Libya due to an imperialist plot in the area (see for example The assembly of the repression of demonstrators in Libya fighter. New lies to justify imperialist interference in North Africa ), in order to overthrow Gaddafi.

I argue, however, that what we are experiencing is a global uprising in the Arab world for reasons mostly global in nature and therefore, Libya can not be distinguished from other Arab countries. On this issue has arisen a debate 3i in the news http://laboratoriodenoticias.es/spip.php?article189 .

I copy here a comment of mine that plays what I defend as opposed to conspiracy theories.

"Do you think really that what is being riding in Libya is mounted on the outside? Do you think really that all that is being mounted in the Arab world, not only in Libya, is mounted on the outside? Do you think that Libya is different from other Arab countries?

Iran supports the "rebels", does this mean that Iran is aligned with the empire? "The struggles in Iraq ( http://www.rebelion.org/noticia.php ... ) are also promoted by the empire? What are you looking for the rule in Iraq to revolt against itself?

is that the conspiracy theory falls on its own, are you trying to argue that everything that happens in the Arab world is different from Libya? "Libya is happening, that is special and that's different? Can you explain why Libya is unlike any other Arab nations where there riots? Or now you're going to argue that everything that happens in the Arab world is a mega conspiracy?

Do you know what is the problem?, You have not yet passed the Third International, that you still determined to see the revolutions in the context of a specific country only, and how this theory can not explain about Libya, then you must use is a plot external. Just to deny the global nature of what is happening.

That the riots in other countries have been peaceful area is another absurd http://www.rebelion.org/noticia.php ...

understand that socialism is different from anti-imperialism. Anti-imperialism is not building socialism. Read what happened in Iran with the Communist Party for supporting anti-imperialist line was that of the Ayatollahs: http://www.rebelion.org/noticia.php ...

What is happening is uprisings in each local context global grounds. So Libya is not saved, there is an uprising against Gaddafi in particular, is an uprising against the price rise, against unemployment, against the lack of future, is a rebellion against the role we have decided from the west they have to play the Arab countries.

I do not compare with Franco Qaddafi, compares you, because you are acting as the English in the civil war, saying "yes yes, the republic is fine, but our man is Frank." And you are saying, "yeah yeah, this is all very well to the global revolution, but our man in the area is Gaddafi."

As Trotsky said, the final theoretical differences are encountered in practice.

One thing is clear, neither want to see NATO because you think you are going to overthrow Qaddafi, because I think I will disarm the people and placed at the front of ex-members Gaddafi cabinet. Or why you think one of the first who resigned was the representative at the UN? "

Americans are quick to manipulate, control and try to guide what is going to defend its imperialist interests. Without But we doubt, we start to argue about whether it's a conspiracy or not. It would be a mistake not now support workers Libyans.

I recommend reading the Arab world to Latin America .

Sleeping On Side Is Bad For Kidneys

permanent revolution and socialism

Since they started the popular revolts in Tunisia my position until recently was calm, cautious, because even if it is true and undeniable that popular revolts there (I say this because there are voices who claim that all is an imperialist plot), and it is also true that the proletariat in these countries are in some way in front of them, the immediate consequences are that leaders in Tunisia the old regime still in power and in the case of Egypt is that they have traded a dictator out of the army to put the army itself, keeping the same regime led and sponsored by the military. And so often utter the word army referring to Egypt because its ubiquitous presence in the political process in this country is just as dominant.

Libya's case is different from me. Is different because although I can not speak of peaceful revolutions [1] in any of the three cases (among other things because I do not think they exist), Libya's people have taken up arms against the regime that oppresses them. And dear readers, try to see in the Libyan regime any hint of socialism, or, with the excuse to declare or has declared anti-imperialist front (because in the background, business is business ) attempting to prove that everything is being part of a plot of the Empire [2], in my view is not to understand anything about anything and everything confused, as journalists mass media is still asking what is happening in northern Africa. Unfortunately revolutions are violent, very violent. The Libyan case demonstrates that revolutions are violent because the minority is in power is not going to leave without a fight, and said some young people Marx and Engels long ago. I'll even go a step further, revolutions or predict or have a single cause or provoke, but once you go past the worst if left lead. And there we are.

currently witnessing the meanness to see how all world powers trying to position the side of the winning horse, to repeat, the worst is over, can influence it. Thus we see how the Western powers have remained cautious until the Libyan regime crumbles and now clearly branded as intolerable violence, Iran now supports the "rebels" ... So-called socialist Latin American powers? No know, no answer. And I am of the view that Latin American socialism "should support at this time the Arab world without reservation in anticipation of the strategy of Western powers, overtaken by events and that Gadhafi is taking the opportunity of a return-military perhaps, but mainly propaganda-as a champion of human rights and democracy " [3]. Support yes, but having clear about our principles and our ideas, avoiding the mistakes of the past [4].

view as brutal acceleration that is taking the story in Libya, perhaps I'm speeding, but the question is, is it possible that the current unrest could lead to a socialist revolution? To answer this question I will try to make use of "Permanent Revolution" [5] Trotsky. This theory involves three ideas.

first addresses the problem of transition of the democratic revolution (phase in which we are now in Libya) to socialist revolution. The theory is, and was confirmed by the Red October Revolution, the democratic demands in the backward states led to the dictatorship of the proletariat. In the words of Trotsky "the democracy was still an intrinsic value regime for several decades and became the immediate prelude to the socialist revolution, united both by a continuous link. " [6]

Second is socialist revolution itself as a process of constant transformation of social relations. For the purpose of this item is worth pausing at this point.

Third highlights the international aspect of the socialist revolution. Never before in human history nations have been more interconnected and dependent on each other as at present. As I argued in my article "Global Strategy" [7] the revolution can only be global, because capitalism has become globalized, globalizing it its own contradictions. Moreover, I am convinced that the revolution will come from the bottom up, from south to north, from the underdeveloped countries to developed countries. We must understand and analyze in detail what is happening because our society will inevitably be affected by events. Once again, the facts beyond and we are caught with the wrong foot, the reality is beyond us and we have to organize at the international level as quickly as possible to avoid what we now do not start in Libya only stay in Libya.

bury once and the Second International, the social democracy, which currently represents the neo-liberal of those who call themselves socialists (in Spain in particular) and Keynesian comparsa declaring the left now. Bury once and the Third International, the revolution in one country, we must learn from the experience of the USSR, the capitalist derives from China, we understand that Cuba is drowning alone in this sea of \u200b\u200bcapitalist sharks. Build from what remains of the Fourth International's International V, socialist and communist revolutionary anti-capitalist, internationalist and radically democratic.

Peoples of Europe, rise up!

-

[1] Jon Juanma, peaceful revolutions, http://www.rebelion.org/noticia.php?id=123019

[2] The assembly of the repression of demonstrators in Libya fighter. New lies to justify the imperialist intervention in northern Africa , http://antimperialista.blogia.com/2011/022301-el-montaje-de-la-represion-de-manifestantes-en-libia-con-cazabombarderos -.- nueva.php

[3] Santiago Alba Rico and Alma Allende the Arab world to Latin America , http://www.rebelion.org/noticia.php?id=123027

[4] Nazanin Amirian, Marxists and Islamists , http: / / www.rebelion.org/noticia.php?id=122880&titular=los-marxistas-y-los-islamismos-

[5] Leon Trotsky, Permanent Revolution Edition Public Journal, Spain, 2009

[6] Leon Trotsky, Permanent Revolution Edition Public Journal, Spain, 2009, p. 59

[7] The Global Strategy - http://laestrategiaglobal.blogspot.com/2011/02/la-estrategia-global.html

How Are Zig Zag Blunt

law. Being single vs. Capsule

Published Rebelion.org

I wanted to do my bit for the debate emerged from Carlos Rivera Lugo article "The legal community" [1], which has attracted so many pages written and led, at least in what concerns me, who spend long hours reading responses and counter-responses.

My last two readings have been "The misery of the law" [2] of the same Carlos Rivera Lugo and "The Law and the Construction of Socialism" [3] Daniel Adam White. My reflection comes from reading that article I cited and has awakened in me a certain feeling that something is wrong, something is lost in this crossroads of ideas.

To focus a little start with the first question (which never hurts), and the principle is what is the law?, Or rather, on what philosophical arguments underlying the current law?.

According to current theories on law, cohabitation, living a man of understanding as a human being with other men, living in society requires order, without which it would not be possible. The basis of the order comes from the fundamental rules that must guide such coexistence. The set of these rules is the natural law. Law that is detectable by human reason, which is consistent with the nature of man, and represents the perfect ideal of justice or fairness.

Natural rights are universal and inalienable: you can not give them and no one can prevent another person from enjoyment of these rights. Today the notion of natural law is contained in the Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen , which will return later at the end of the article.

When this law is in effect, that is, when ruling on the particular moment in which he provides, we speak of positive law. Positive law and natural law are consistent, as positive law has to draw on the natural, not contradicting, but its principles and rules developed under the circumstances and needs of the moment and place. Only your harmony with natural law positivism legitimate, and makes it fair or unfair. From an objective point of view, it is a set of rules to be guided by natural law.

Therefore, all our current law is based on the ideal of justice, perfect justice. No need to do a thorough study of the socio-historical account to be an ideal of justice that has not always been the same, even in the same time (I think that there is an ideal, but as a consequence of social relations and production prevailing in a given time). Then, further deepening the concrete, what kind of ideal of justice prevail today?, What is behind this ethical ideal of justice and why?.

If we analyze the Declaration on the Rights of Man and Citizen and ethical conscience or currently prevailing in Western culture, we note that this ideal of justice is essentially individualistic, is an exaltation of the individual being that must be protected from threats from other individual beings. This individualistic view of human being is not trivial, served the bourgeoisie to emancipate themselves from the feudal system.

With the development of the ethic of individual self it took a superstructure above and separate individual beings to keep these were destroyed each other, since it rarely defend the rights of some are and are confronted with the rights of others. But this structure, the modern state, does not escape control of the bourgeoisie, it was created precisely to impose this vision of human beings. It then comes to the exploitation of the majority by a minority, with the excuse of defending individual rights, but in practice in the defense of individual rights of that minority against the collective rights of the majority. The individual right to exploit natural resources that are mine are on my property or against the collective right of access to water, for example.

currently witnessing a barrage of exaltation of the individual being , everywhere, in all areas. Priority is socially individual success, the American dream. See for yourself, your happiness, your self-esteem is pervasive, and the other, your neighbor, is a potential enemy.

Turning to the issue that concerns us, the current law positivists think that is an expression of an ideal course of justice from human reasoning should not, the current law used to impose a particular vision of human beings The vision of the individual being . And we recognize that after so many years has been wiped from the consciousness of the inhabitants of this old Europe any semblance of collective consciousness. It is not just private property, which also but to fight the individual consciousness that is leading us into chaos.

In Spain I heard more than one occasion and I still hear the idea that those who have "dared" to buy a house, and become unemployed or can not afford it, now go without it (and with part of the debt if the house paid off in full) are irresponsible by buying it. They wasted!, They say. Look how far this individualistic ethic is so deep into our consciences to lose, and I'll personally, any glimmer of heart, empathy, close your eyes and imagine ourselves in the place of another. The practical consequence of defending the individual right of banks to collect debts being of entire neighborhoods of our cities empty and in the hands of a few entities. The current law, as a carrier of the ethics of individual self , makes any attempt to legislate in the community post is in vain, not only because the rulers to legislate for the few already rich, but because they have gotten assume and share his narrow vision of human beings.

If the construction of socialism is a transition period to communism where people with an individualistic ethic yet we are gradually creating a new world based on an ethic collective (social or collective be ) , current law does not serve as a carrier of individualism itself, moreover, is a tool to extend it.

Do not we realize that the construction of socialist ethics and usually passes through the socialization of the rules rather than the maintenance of tax law and enforcement? Do not we realize that the construction of socialism does not go through the conquest of the modern state today, but by overcoming them? Do not we realize that it is not know what steps to build socialism, but to socialize the decisions we take to build? In short, do not we realize that it is possible that the key is to socialize as much as possible the decisions to be radically democratic and trust that distributed power and be able to build together a better, more just and egalitarian ?

In my humble opinion, the construction of socialism inexorably socialization of decisions, the creation of direct, participatory democracy where none exist. Since our immediate environment to the communities most universal.

I have the conviction that the construction of socialism must be radically by all and not from taxation based on an ideal course of justice.

Some notes on the Declaration on the Rights of Man and Citizen

criticism yet I do in this article about the deeply individualistic Declaration on the Rights of Man and Citizen (HR) now serve to highlight the contradictions of the imperialist powers that claim to defend facade but in practice the maximum applied business is business . They serve to highlight that this dictatorship of the market in which we find is inconsistent with achieving the same (HR) for all humanity and therefore help us not to align and rebel against this reality.

According to Julio Anguita, " short, the conquest of human rights for all Mankind not only trigger processes that affect the contradictions of capitalism is also at the same time, the struggle for a new situation of greater justice, welfare, civic values \u200b\u200bbased on rights and duties and ethics of the community that would Fernández Buey. Without going through this stage there will be neither socialism nor communism. " [4].

But this does not mean that the human rights front, we must also establish collective rights, against the vision of man's be individual must build the ethic of be collective or social .

-

[1] http://www.rebelion.org/noticia.php?id=117096

[2] http://www.rebelion.org/noticia.php?id=121941

[3] Http://www.rebelion.org/noticia.php?id=121754

[4] http://pce.es/mundoobrero/mopl.php?id = 1232

Example Of Letter Of Disconnection

The Amigurumi:)





Hey guys! TELL THEM THAT IN THE RUNNING OF THIS WEEK, I HAVE NOT RECEIVED VERY GOOD NEWS, AND TRYING TO GIVE A TOUCH MY SOUL FOUND TO SHARE WITH ALL THIS VIDEO.QUIERO UDS. TO SEE IF CAUSE THEM THE SAME AS ME. THESE ARE SUPER TENDER AND STEP amigurumi DAN NICE IDEAS.

A STRONG HUG FOR ALL!

When Can I Wear Heels After Bunion Surgery

be collective local key Murcia: Groucho Marx, unions and firms. Neither

Unions warn the signatory officials listed firms not to get manipulated by non-signatory unions.

Signed: Unions signatory.

Sibutramine Mechanism

PP and PSOE. Essential reading.

Sticks and stones may break our bones but words can burn a government

Repairing Rusty Bathroom Towel Rack

harmful consequences of pollution in Madrid tag

A major problem affecting large cities of developed countries or developing countries is the high level of pollution every day hitting the inhabitants of those cities. This past week, the lack of wind and rain, pollution in the city of Madrid is reaching dangerous limits and harmful to the health of the people and wildlife of that city.

The EU directive sets the limit value Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) in 18 exceedances in one hour during a year of 200 micrograms / cubic meters. Well, in early February, several parts of Madrid have exceeded the allowable limit.

From any point of the Madrid can appreciate the great cloud of pollution that plagues the city that straddles the outlying cities of Madrid belt. Even rural community begin to be affected, starting its monitoring stations for air pollution to rise.

(View of Madrid from Moratalaz)

Serious health damage

The high concentration of particles that causes the NO2 has serious consequences for the health of any person:

· aggravates all kinds of respiratory diseases
· Causes cardiovascular disease because the smaller particles pierce the lungs and enter the blood causing illness.
allergies? Enhancing the action of the same as the pollen reacting to pollution and become more aggressive.
· Death premature.

(Vista del barrio de Chamartin)

The inaction of politicians and businessmen

As expected, politicians of the Community of Madrid, Madrid City Council, State Government English and the employer's motor (ANFAC) not hesitate to squeeze in bulk and throwing off the problem to other . Thus we can see and feel their deep concern for the people.
Madrid City Council flatly refuses to shut down traffic or policies against trafficking, using the strike to justify their passivity by manipulating the meter or changing air quality of Rank Outlet in parks where pollution is lower.
Councillor for Environment, Ana Botella in its line of ignorant but well plugged into the party and imbecil ity to which we are accustomed, states that "the air quality in Madrid is the best we have had in history because we have done many things ". Even says "we are in a time when people are depressed by unemployment. This choking them more " and attributed the high levels of NO2 at a mere circumstance of atmospheric stability.

The possibilities gives the council to move to Madrid as an alternative the car (the main generator of the pollution) is to use public transport. But in Madrid, much as they love to brag about public transport is totally inadequate. But here's where it comes out, that the policies pursued by these chupópteros only are aimed precisely at promoting public transport, but private, continue to benefit the automotive industry, oil, etc:

• The transport Madrid has a very high cost.
· The fleets of buses are scarce, especially in working class neighborhoods where timeouts are 15 to 20 minutes.
• The connection is bad Intercity buses also of many lines have been cut under the guise of the crisis and the cuts.
• The vast majority of public transport is not even on the industrial estates.
Do not you work on promoting other transportation, such as cycling

If they are already overstretched public transport service normally What do you want then these parasites do to move to Madrid?.

ANFAC, as a good representative of the employer and always willing to make more for less, indicates that the government in 2008 approved an amendment to exempt from payment of registration tax on cleaner cars to support the creation of the same but only took into account the emission of CO2 (greenhouse gas), but was not taken into account all the other gases emitted from tailpipes of cars. The result was an incentive to invest more in preventing diesel fuel.

Vallekas Pollution and consequences of the construction of the Power Plant and Solid Waste Treatment

Vallekas's neighbors, we were not going to get rid of all the ills that plague the city of Madrid . The Widening Vallekas (the part of Vallekas farther from the center of Madrid) already reached the limit allowed by European Directive being alone in the month of February . As if this were not enough, every year over the limit. If all this were not enough, is being finalized to build the power station and Central Pneumatic Solid Waste Collection in Vallekas Bridge, near the famous so-called "eco-neighborhood." It is constantly giving 365 days of years the waste left over from the combustion of gas, emanating from other wastes, water vapor, nitrogen and CO2. Burning heating is a serious health risk to people living around you, as irritates the airways and facilitates the penetration of allergens, among other problems as respiratory ailments.

The state seems to be that Vallekas sees as the focus of experimentation with new forms of energy production, operating and hiding the reality of these projects. The neighbors still do not have any information about it on central and he has little to be finished. There is no set brick famous ecobarrio "and politicians are still passing the ball or promising things that never come, as the environmental impact statement that the Madrid promised in early 2010.

(Cloud of pollution Park view from the Cerro del Tio Pio Vallekas)

"Alternatives to capitalism?

progressives love to fill his mouth with the word recycle. They make us feel guilty for the destruction of the earth, and raise energy alternatives that devastate wildlife and benefit to many private companies and generating cost savings of capital does not benefit the people and themselves in their pockets. Capitalism is a system based on exploitation of one people over others. Some invest, others generate wealth and are investing it. That has created an operating system with each passing day more and more about rich and others are becoming poorer. This is accentuated by more time spent as educate us to be productive machines for large companies rather than enhance our humanity as unique. People who are unable to adapt to the enormous demands of capitalism, will be scrapped, promoting social exclusion. The more profitable it is, the more it operates regardless of the consequences, if it runs more profitable alternatives are sought to give more benefits and exploited regardless of the consequences. Businessmen, bankers, and politicians make millions and / workers are just victims of their crisis and their experiments in many fields to consolidate profits on the blood / as workers / as innocent in the case we are discussing, we die and die from many respiratory diseases, cardiovascular or suffer throughout their lives allergies of any kind limiting their individual potential.

The only alternative to this system is the destruction of material by turmoil and social unrest aimed at building and construction of libertarian communism. In the hands of / workers is the to live in fear, sitting on the couch and watching stupid breathing pollution or destruction of the planet live, to cope with our increasingly stifling and miserable life cuts and inhumane conditions that have to withstand the working class o. ........ the social war.

Saturn Planet In Hindi

And the magic word is ...

Lately at night I feel some pain in the back, not to be, but perhaps the last use of the word flexible may explain the mystery.

Zapatero calls for greater flexibility in the labor market
labor reform after the president wants to reform collective agreements
http://www.tercerainformacion.es/spip.php?article22094

is the new slogan, flexible. Began easing the labor reform, thereby cutting rights, continued adopting a flexible pension reform and progressive (progressive added here because not only sneak flexible at all) and more cuts, and now also wants more flexible collective agreements.

more flexible, more flexible, which way to dirty a word that itself contains a meaning moderate, peaceful and serene with the biggest assault on the rights of workers in the years we have democracy (if you can call it this neoliberal dictatorship disguised).

Gentlemen, I do not know about you, but I'm tired of bend. Given the neoliberal flexibility, working stiff, hard word, although admittedly more just and dignified. With head high and back straight.

Do Not Sit Close To Printer

HOLDER AGENDA






GOOD !!!... HELLO GIRLS, I'M HERE TO TELL NUEVAMENTE.LES todabia NOT HAVE CAMERA AND THESE ARE TAKEN WITH pics CELULAR.ESPERO THAT one can see rightly. FUNDIT FOR THIS AGENDA WAS a gift for my daughter who ALREADY STARTED AGAIN FOR THE SCHOOL AND LOVE THESE small gifts. ADAPTING THE CLOTH WAS JUST MADE UP TO LEAVING notebook COMPRE.LES CHART THAT POINT THAT UTILICE.LA TRUTH IS NOT WHERE YOU TAKE IT OUT. IF YOU HAVE YOU ACKNOWLEDGE ME AS YOU DO FAVOR.MIENTRAS KNOW WHAT I SHARE WITH ALL. BESOS

Hand Foot And Mouth Can You Get It Twice

Tally 7.2 Internal Error

cute and EASY! Share magazines

Why Do I Always Get Stomach Cramp

flexible Strategy Global

time ago I head round an idea, a concern. I pursued and somehow it dominates all other political positions, other ideas, other intellectual developments, directs everything. This idea is is that however much we want, we will not solve a global problem with local solutions. This is not to say that the solutions and local strength are not important, indeed necessary to raise awareness of class and are the basis of what I set out below is the local path . But they are still palliative if not coordinated in what we might call a Global Strategy conducive to be continued over time and to share the movement (Marx called it the party, as a general term that encompasses all shades socialist / communist) lessons learned.

From the point of view, "scientific", we have the object of study (historical processes), we have the laboratory (society), we have the method (dialectical materialism) and we even have technology transfer (practice). What we have are methodologies, standards, frameworks , frames to share results and experiences, all that we lack, does not exist and we do not even plant built. At least there to the extent that the whole movement feel integrated into a common framework for action. Right now all we have are many trends that are dedicated to debate endlessly over whether his theory of how to build socialism is better or more appropriate than the other. And even dogmatic tendencies, as if that socialism was an act of faith, blind faith in a theory that works but that does not rely on practical experience. In addition, we often more focused on what divides us than what unites us. Let's be honest, nobody has seen socialism, no one knows how to build, more, for instance, in the words of Fidel Castro in an act of openness and sincerity says

" One conclusion I've drawn after many years is that the many mistakes we have made all the more important it was to believe that anyone knew of socialism, or that anyone knew how to build socialism"

The Strategy Global is to go one step further and build a global framework in which to discuss and choose which theory applied to a specific historical time and place, and to coordinate the actions necessary to carry it out.

Before presenting as it should be, in my humble opinion, overall this overall framework, I would like to analyze the current situation.

1. Capitalism does not work and can not be reformed.
   seems obvious, but we must strive to prove it. Does not work as from what point of view of the beholder. In fact if it works for whom it is promoted, crisis after crisis has managed to metamorphose and move forward, has managed to globalize and has also managed to create an ethic about: individualism and consumerism, a culture of the material, the right now and the immediate satisfaction stalled in humanity. Our enemy is very good, lean and compelling, in addition, the ethics that involves a direct impact on our animal instincts, which easily identified (the ethics) as ours, as part of us.
   not work from the point of view the proposal as a global economic system. Overall capitalism generates more poverty and misery in the world despite the spectacular even scientific development of the twentieth century. And not me, as an example, we can see the monitoring of Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) launched by the UN as the UN itself recognized year after year that we are moving away from them. The poverty goal was to halve by 2015, a modest goal, but even so.
   important thing, the hardest thing is to show that Capitalism can not reform, which always tends to the accumulation of capital by the few and the misery of others, show that the Keynesian reformist attempts eventually lead to ultra-liberal trends. Why?. In my humble opinion Keynesianism deals only with the distribution of wealth, it is only on good intentions, but it goes to the root of the problem, production, and also ideologically competing in a system that tends precisely to the contrary, to the accumulation of wealth, not the cast. Keynesianism worked for a specified period, the reconstruction of Europe, but fell into crisis in the '70s, and in the years 80 is called from the market deregulation in order to continue to grow, and hence globalization and neoliberalism. You can not reform a system based on infinite growth in a finite resource (even becoming more productive), and is now more evident than ever. A policy has joined environmentalism as a result of global warming, ecopolitics , a sign that the planet has its limits and that capitalism, yet we know to what extent, the getting over it.
   A good article to understand the evolution of capitalism and its crisis , see "The structural crisis in the historical dynamics of social change " ( http://www.rebelion.org/noticia.php?id=120000&titular=las-crisis-estructurales-en-la-dina% CC% 81mica-histo % CC% 81rica-of-social-change ).
2. capitalism has become globalized, globalizing it its own contradictions.
   We (the West) the bourgeoisie of the world and we are exploiting the rest of the world, and is not expected to rebel against the bourgeoisie itself. Despite the attack on the welfare state in Europe by the dictatorship markets, no live at all bad, compared to the rest of the world. The global revolution will not come from Europe or the U.S., but that does not mean that we are prepared and we support the revolutionary upheavals in other parts of the world, even when these crises provoke riots in our capitalist states. I am convinced that the global socialist process will come from the bottom up, in underdeveloped countries to developed countries. To prevent movement of the in capitalist states put against another part of the movement in proletarian states , it is necessary that the movement to impregnate and assume the global nature of the struggle. We must avoid the struggles of workers among workers under capitalist banners.
3. global warming warns us of the urgency.
   Our analysis can not ignore the urgency of implementing a global economic system not based on growth for growth, not based on this fever that grips us all to grow, even without meaning, as if we were a cancer. It is not about being alarmist but it is abundantly clear that the planet has signs of illness, the cause is us and what is worse, we do not know to what extent we are approaching a point of no return.
   Our struggle is not only for the purpose of exploitation, our struggle is now also the defense of our environment and the ultimate aim of protecting the planet. We understand that there is no politics without ecology, and more importantly, that there is no political ecology. The defense of the environment must pass through a critique of the global system that encourages this vicious attack to it, can not defend the natural environment while being soft on capitalism, because as I said in the past, We just stay in a palliative, and good intentions, and not attack the root of the problem.
   Therefore, since we are not playing a better world for our children and grandchildren, not what we're playing is that our descendants have a world to live.

As I said, capitalism has become globalized, and he has emerged a world power, the markets, and political characterization, the dictatorship of the market . All succumb to the power of markets , Cuba is considering opening up the capital, China's capitalist governments legislate to Europe are threats to the sovereign debt. We can not defend ourselves if markets globalize our struggle, but the global coordinate. There is much to build and little time.

And here comes the center of reflection, what organization could coordinate something?, Is there any candidate now?, How should it work?.

Let's start by trying to discern what qualities should be desirable. My experience "scientific" design that tells me that what I know now, not on what we know design. What do we know then?, Or rather, what I think I know?

1. is not just to win, but to convince.
   I think the important thing is not coming to power, power is not the ultimate end is the beginning of a process, or even this. We should not see the coming to power of a capitalist state as a victory, it is not, is only an indicator of the consistency of movement in a particular geographical area. No, the process begins within us and how we interact, and how we organize ourselves, and we decided with others.
   We can not ask workers to rely on socialism and communism because all I have seen are attempts and failed states. We can not convince workers to join the socialist cause if you do not participate in it, if not build it themselves.
   The organization must be radically democratic, participatory and direct democracy, invisibility of representatives (try to explain this concept later). Moreover, the entities that form part of this will be incorporating the radical democratic in its internal decision-making. It is about building democracy where there is not, is to convince by example and consistency. Thus, when somewhere you can come to power by the revolt of the masses, we have come a long way and many experience.
2. Distributed, avoid SPOF. Critical to the single party.
   We must evolve. Marx looked to the French commune and played the need for a strong central party to lead the process. We should look to the former USSR, China and others and conclude that it is necessary to democracy (participatory and direct), a distributed system or fail. The single party is a SPOF ( Single Point of Failure ), a point singular failure . Is corrupted, the bureaucratization and thwarts the process. Our network (intentionally and not talk about organization) should be distributed, multipoint, and coordinated.
   need a thorough debate about what we mean by coordination, as should be the coordinators, how often and how to renew. Also participates in each of the areas or points, meetings, presentations. As for voting on the outcome of the work areas or points. It is not easy to design a distributed system.
   A distributed system is not SPOFs, some items may assign, corrupted, but the network would remain in place and create more points and keep growing.
3. points (or bases) of the network.
   workers do not do politics in the political parties (always speaking in the European context), if we understand by policy actions that allow us to transform the society in which we live. The so-called leftist political parties and European Communists decided to leave the industry, social work and leave the street, decided to leave the neighborhood, decided to leave the workers at the bottom to go to the heights and from there decide what is best for workers, even when they are. And now wonder, where are the workers?. Fortunately, there are always ways of participation. Funny how during the most individualistic, consumerist and more liberal capitalism, there volunteering and emerge stronger non-governmental organizations non-profit. Funny how those who left political parties have been occupying the partnerships, associations.
   The association has evolved so has managed to create global institutions that work and where workers can participate. More Greenpeace environmentalism by all parties green together. The association is an important foundation of the network, connecting us with reality.
   addition of associations, of course, political parties, trade unions, social movements and even entire nations could be part of the network, arriving at the event.
4. socialist ethics. The project that unites us.
   Is there a socialist ethic?. This is a complex and important debate. What is being proposed here is a possible framework in which to decide what steps we should be giving globally, to build a better, more just and equitable. But any entity that would could be part of this network?, could accept within this network to a political party that governs in a nation that does not respect human rights?
   The network should bring an agreement, a project or explicit ethics and must be respected and included all members of the same and should be radically socialist. Reviewable and Concord. A good start would be anti-capitalist, participatory and direct democracy and human rights.
   For reference of this debate, I invite you to check the article "of Marxism, democracy and relativism" ( http://www.rebelion.org/noticia.php?id=120647 ). It will link all the other items relating to a debate in this area.

Asked if any organization candidate for the above, I have no answer. I do not think there is any with these characteristics or in the process of having them. The WSF is too disorganized to be just as well in the good intentions of a more just, but nothing of substance of the problem, production. And if not, will be invented.

has globalized capitalism and its making pointless calls for more sacrifices and tributes. We are approaching some really hard We're crossing ecological lines that do not yet know the consequences and movement as a whole is weaker and more disorganized than ever. Yet the foundations are solid, we are a generation prepared, committed and strong. To us to fight for the legacy that our parents and grandparents left us, overcoming them, we have much work and little time, yet not only win but be convinced. Peoples of Europe, Rise Up! Globalization socialism or barbarism!

Health.