is emerging in the English left, as far as I know, the idea that the rebellions in particular in Libya due to an imperialist plot in the area (see for example The assembly of the repression of demonstrators in Libya fighter. New lies to justify imperialist interference in North Africa ), in order to overthrow Gaddafi.
I argue, however, that what we are experiencing is a global uprising in the Arab world for reasons mostly global in nature and therefore, Libya can not be distinguished from other Arab countries. On this issue has arisen a debate 3i in the news http://laboratoriodenoticias.es/spip.php?article189 .
I copy here a comment of mine that plays what I defend as opposed to conspiracy theories.
"Do you think really that what is being riding in Libya is mounted on the outside? Do you think really that all that is being mounted in the Arab world, not only in Libya, is mounted on the outside? Do you think that Libya is different from other Arab countries?
Iran supports the "rebels", does this mean that Iran is aligned with the empire? "The struggles in Iraq ( http://www.rebelion.org/noticia.php ... ) are also promoted by the empire? What are you looking for the rule in Iraq to revolt against itself?
is that the conspiracy theory falls on its own, are you trying to argue that everything that happens in the Arab world is different from Libya? "Libya is happening, that is special and that's different? Can you explain why Libya is unlike any other Arab nations where there riots? Or now you're going to argue that everything that happens in the Arab world is a mega conspiracy?
Do you know what is the problem?, You have not yet passed the Third International, that you still determined to see the revolutions in the context of a specific country only, and how this theory can not explain about Libya, then you must use is a plot external. Just to deny the global nature of what is happening.
That the riots in other countries have been peaceful area is another absurd http://www.rebelion.org/noticia.php ...
understand that socialism is different from anti-imperialism. Anti-imperialism is not building socialism. Read what happened in Iran with the Communist Party for supporting anti-imperialist line was that of the Ayatollahs: http://www.rebelion.org/noticia.php ...
What is happening is uprisings in each local context global grounds. So Libya is not saved, there is an uprising against Gaddafi in particular, is an uprising against the price rise, against unemployment, against the lack of future, is a rebellion against the role we have decided from the west they have to play the Arab countries.
I do not compare with Franco Qaddafi, compares you, because you are acting as the English in the civil war, saying "yes yes, the republic is fine, but our man is Frank." And you are saying, "yeah yeah, this is all very well to the global revolution, but our man in the area is Gaddafi."
As Trotsky said, the final theoretical differences are encountered in practice.
One thing is clear, neither want to see NATO because you think you are going to overthrow Qaddafi, because I think I will disarm the people and placed at the front of ex-members Gaddafi cabinet. Or why you think one of the first who resigned was the representative at the UN? "
Americans are quick to manipulate, control and try to guide what is going to defend its imperialist interests. Without But we doubt, we start to argue about whether it's a conspiracy or not. It would be a mistake not now support workers Libyans.
0 comments:
Post a Comment